Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1064

reference
602-tree-1
name
1064
tree-preservation-order

undefined

602-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.020080 50.879935)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.020023 50.879929,-1.020026 50.879940,-1.020034 50.879950,-1.020046 50.879959,-1.020062 50.879964,-1.020080 50.879966,-1.020097 50.879964,-1.020113 50.879959,-1.020126 50.879951,-1.020134 50.879941,-1.020137 50.879930,-1.020135 50.879919,-1.020127 50.879909,-1.020114 50.879901,-1.020099 50.879896,-1.020081 50.879894,-1.020063 50.879895,-1.020048 50.879900,-1.020035 50.879908,-1.020027 50.879918,-1.020023 50.879929)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL